Popular Microservices Development Patterns: CRUD VS. CQRS

CRUD and CQRS are two of the most prevalent methods for dealing with data manipulation. CQRS stands for Command and Query Responsibility Segregation, whereas CRUD stands for Create, Read, Update, and Delete. In classic data manipulation applications, CRUD structures are unquestionably the most frequent. It is noticed that most developers are accustomed to CRUD as the bulk of the material and tools available strive to support this pattern in some form. Any tool or framework that advertises itself as a quick method to bring your software to market involves some form of scaffolding or dynamic CRUD development. But the software coming out these days can be quite complex, involving more complex business processes with workflows and state machines that are difficult to express using the classic CRUD paradigm. As a result of these challenges, a new set of data manipulation patterns known as CQRS has arisen to challenge the classic CRUD methodology. There are several implementations of this pattern available, including the idea of Event Sourcing. All of these are excellent patterns to learn and understand as part of your software development toolset. While the transition away from old CRUD methods is beneficial, it may also be troublesome. Let’s take a look at how the CRUD and CQRS patterns differ from each other.

What Does CRUD Mean?

Working with a database necessitates the transformation of raw data into useful information before gaining insights. This implies that numerous actions, such as reading, creating, updating, or deleting data bits, are required. Those operations are referred to as CRUD operations. CRUD structures are unquestionably the most frequent in traditional data manipulation applications. We use the same data model for read and write operations in this situation. One of the primary advantages of this design is its simplicity. You can use the same set of classes for all functions.

The majority of simple data manipulation activities would most likely be best serviced by a CRUD design, which is also our preferred strategy. However, as your use cases become increasingly sophisticated, you might want to seek an alternative approach. The intent is one of the things that a CRUD Architecture lacks. Assume we needed to update the Customer’s address. We just update the property and issue an update statement in a CRUD architecture. We can’t tell if the change was caused by an inaccurate value or because the consumer relocated. Perhaps we have a business scenario where we must send a notification to an external system in the event of a move. A CQRS Architecture could be a better match in this scenario.

What Does CQRS Mean?

The CQRS pattern is frequently used in conjunction with the Event Sourcing pattern. CQRS-based systems employ distinct read and write data models, each tuned to specific activities and frequently placed in physically different stores. When used with the Event Sourcing design, the write model is the storage of events, and it serves as the authoritative source of information. A CQRS-based system’s read model delivers materialized views of the data, often as highly denormalized views. These views are tuned to the application’s interfaces and display needs, which helps to maximize both display and query speed. By incorporating CQRS into your application, you can improve its speed, scalability, and security. The flexibility gained by migrating to CQRS enables a system to grow more effectively over time and prevents update instructions from triggering merge conflicts at the domain level.

The use of distinct query and update models simplifies design and implementation. One drawback is that CQRS code cannot be produced automatically from a database schema utilizing scaffolding methods such as O/RM tools. You can physically divide the read data from the write data for additional isolation. In such instances, the read database can utilize its own query-optimized data structure.

5 Major Differences Between CRUD and CQRS

CRUD:

• For both read and write operations, the same DTO i.e. data transfer object is used.
• There’s a chance that read and write operations will be out of sync.
• Appropriate for small business logic to be used in data activities.
• Scaffolding code can be generated by tools to automate its implementation.
• As both read and write activities are permitted, security and permissions become more difficult to manage.

CQRS:

• Read and write operations are performed via different interfaces.
• Interfaces are used to handle the separation of concerns.
• It’s also compatible with the Event Sourcing design.
• The scaffold technique cannot be used to build it automatically.
• Better performance and security as a result of the separation of issues.

Which One To Choose: CRUD Or CQRS?

The CRUD model is a straightforward method of describing data and delivering it as a service interface. This may be OK for small database tables, but modeling processes using the CRUD pattern will be difficult for a database with several tables and foreign key associations. Furthermore, because the operations do not represent business domain processes, modeling the software system that employs it becomes difficult. CQRS avoids the major drawbacks of CRUD, and when combined with event sourcing, it gives a full audit log that allows us to go back in time to any point in the system’s history. However, it, too, has some issues in terms of complexity, messaging, and maintaining eventual uniformity.

In conclusion, there are some exciting new software development patterns and techniques that developers should be aware of, but they should be considered as new tools rather than new toolboxes. It is seen that the toolkit has only changed a few times in decades of professional software development, and people switch to new patterns mostly to get rid of old ones. There are still some applications that rely on the classic CRUD model and it is tough to persuade them to try anything new. So it’s entirely up to you and your requirements which pattern to choose either CRUD or CQRS. Mainly, it is important to remember that patterns should not be used to define your program but to help solve problems. Concentrate your efforts more on addressing the challenges for which you built the program rather than following development patterns such as CRUD or CQRS. At Ksolves, we know how to personalize things to your exact needs, and we’re specialists in modernizing obsolete IT systems. From the construction of event-driven Microservices Architecture through their integration and subsequent modification, we provide and master it all!

Contact Us for any Query

Email: sales@ksolves.com

Call: +91 8130704295

Read related article –

The Importance of Application Modernization for Businesses in 2021

If You Think You Know All About Microservices, Think Again!